Foreign Nationals & Expats
Houston Tax Attorney
- 1 Foreign Life Insurance Taxation
- 1.1 How U.S. Life Insurance Policies are Taxed
- 1.2 Tax and Reporting Requirements of Foreign Life Insurance Policies
- 1.3 Conclusion
- 1.4 Why Choose Us for your Offshore Compliance Matter?
Foreign Life Insurance Taxation
Life insurance can be good way to ensure that loved ones are taken care of in the event of an unfortunate situation. However, owning a foreign life insurance policy with cash value can prove to be more of a headache than it’s worth. We’ve come across such types of investments regularly in our offshore compliance cases; the reporting and tax obligations can be burdensome. Hopefully, this article will help foreign insurance policy owners understand their U.S. tax obligations.
How U.S. Life Insurance Policies are Taxed
A whole life insurance policy is part investment and part life insurance. Such policies have two basic financial components – cash value and death benefit. Insurance companies take policy premiums and invest them. The investments in turn are used to pay death benefits and “cashed out” policies. The cash value of the policy increases as premiums are paid and as the investment grows. This investment portion of it is tax-deferred – no tax will be paid on the cash value unless the policy holder cashes out the policy. The policy holder will pay a tax on the investment gain. The death benefit, or face value of the policy, is paid to the beneficiaries tax-free.
Insurance companies in the U.S. are heavily regulated as stock or mutual companies. Additionally, they pay taxes on the investment income they earn from investing policyholders’ premiums. A foreign life insurance company, on the other hand, cannot be regulated by the U.S. nor taxed by the U.S. unless they happen to have U.S. source income. They may have few regulations and possibly pay little or no foreign taxes. Many foreign life insurance policies are more investment oriented than actually life insurance policies and potentially have a huge advantage over U.S. life insurance companies. In order to level the playing field and close this and other loopholes, Congress enacted the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and subsequent legislation.
Since the U.S. has no authority to tax the foreign life insurance companies directly, they imposed onerous reporting requirements for U.S. policy holders of such investments.
Tax and Reporting Requirements of Foreign Life Insurance Policies
As indicated above, a whole life insurance policy is part investment and part insurance product. Taxation of such policies is determined based on the primary function of the policy.
Is it a Life Insurance Policy or an Investment?
IRC Code §7702 contains a two-pronged test. An insurance policy is non-taxable if it meets either (i) the cash value accumulation test or (ii) the guideline premium requirement and the specified cash value corridor.
Cash Value Accumulation Test (CVAT)
The CVAT requires a fairly straightforward determination: does the cash value of the insurance policy exceed the present value of all future premium payments on the policy?
Guideline premium requirement
A contract meets the guideline premium requirements of section 7702(c) if the sum of the premiums paid under the contract does not at any time exceed the greater of the guideline single premium or the sum of the guideline level premiums as of such time.
The guideline single premium is the premium that is needed at the time the policy is issued to fund the future benefits under the contract based on the following three elements:
- Reasonable mortality charges that meet the requirements (if any) prescribed in regulations and that (except as provided in regulations) do not exceed the mortality charges specified in the prevailing commissioners’ standard tables (as defined in section 807(d)(5)) as of the time the contract is issued;
- Any reasonable charges (other than mortality charges) that (on the basis of the company’s experience, if any, with respect to similar contracts) are reasonably expected to be actually paid; and
- Interest at the greater of an annual effective rate of six percent or the rate or rates guaranteed on issuance of the contract.
Specified Cash Value Corridor
A policy falls within the cash value corridor if the death benefit of the contract at any time is not less than the applicable percentage of the cash surrender value. The applicable percentage is determined based on the attained age of the insured as of the beginning of the contract year, as follows:
|In the case of an insured with an attained age as of the beginning of the contract year of:||The applicable percentage shall decrease by a ratable portion for each full year:|
|More than:||But not more than:||From:||To:|
Tax on the Inside Buildup
If the policy does not meet either of the above tests, IRC Code §7702(g)(1)(A) becomes applicable: “If at any time any contract which is a life insurance contract under the applicable law does not meet the definition of life insurance contract, the income on the contract for any taxable year of the policyholder shall be treated as ordinary income received or accrued by the policyholder during such year.” In other words, the policy holder is subject to a tax on the increase in cash value of the policy each year, even if the policy isn’t actually cashed out.
U.S. Excise Tax: This may be one of the more ridiculous parts of the Internal Revenue Code. IRC §4371 requires policy holders to file a quarterly excise tax form (Form 720) to report and pay a 1% excise tax on insurance premiums paid to foreign life insurers.
Form 720 was meant for businesses to fill out for miscellaneous taxes such as transportation of persons by air, kerosene use, aviation gasoline, liquefied hydrogen, and other arcane items. IRS sneaked in “foreign insurance taxes” near the top of the 2nd page of the form. Because the form was designed for businesses to fill out, it cannot be filed using an SSN. Policy holders must apply online for an EIN, solely for purposes of filling out this form and paying the excise tax!
FinCEN 114 “FBAR” and Form 8938 “FATCA”
U.S. persons owning foreign financial accounts with values in excess of $10,000 at any point during the year are require to file FinCEN 114, commonly known as FBAR with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) on a yearly basis. “Foreign financial account” includes an account that is an insurance or annuity policy with a cash surrender value.
Foreign life policies are also considered “specified foreign financial assets” for Form 8938 purposes and must be reported annually if the value exceeds the applicable threshold.
Form 8621 “PFIC”
If there’s any good news coming from this, it’s that foreign life insurance policies are usually not considered to be passive foreign investment companies. There is no Form 8621 filing requirement if the holder of a life insurance contract does not have control over the available investment accounts. IRC §1297(b)(2)(B)(3), Treas. Reg. §1.367(a)-2T.
Foreign life insurance policies can be tricky for tax and reporting purposes, and those that are not compliant can face numerous penalties. For instance, a non-willful failure to file Form 114 and 8938 carry maximum penalties of $10,000 per form, per year. Where a person willfully fails to file an FBAR, the IRS may impose a penalty equal to the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the account’s highest balance. While these can be poor investment choices due to the burdensome reporting requirements and should probably be avoided, for those who do own such policies, it is important to fully disclose them and pay all applicable taxes.
Why Choose Us for your Offshore Compliance Matter?
I come from several years of diverse tax experience, having worked at the IRS, public accounting, and law.
Some firms who specialize in offshore compliance boast about the hundreds of cases they handle each year. It makes you wonder – how much time is the attorney really spending on your matter? Each case is unique and you deserve to have someone listen to and understand your particular situation. We are not and do not strive to be a high volume practice.
Beware of those who claim the attorney you hire needs X amount of experience of X, Y, Z credentials (and coincidentally that person recommending it will have the exact same or similar qualification). We have had many calls from dissatisfied clients and former clients from some of these firms. We’ve heard about high pressure sales tactics and cases being assigned to inexperienced attorneys (or worse EAs) with some firms. Not all experience is good experience.
We have a 100% success rate with our streamlined submissions. In addition, we’ve saved clients hundreds of thousands in misc. offshore penalties through various types of penalty abatement.